Fixed problem with the comparation function between two FullNode instances
This commit is contained in:
parent
b70881dfb5
commit
878bc52d78
4 changed files with 95 additions and 12 deletions
|
@ -55,14 +55,6 @@ public class FullNode implements Comparable {
|
|||
this.mUrl = mUrl;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return The exponential moving average object instance
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public ExponentialMovingAverage getLatencyAverage(){
|
||||
return mLatency;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return The latest latency average value. If no measurement has been taken yet, the
|
||||
|
@ -96,7 +88,13 @@ public class FullNode implements Comparable {
|
|||
@Override
|
||||
public int compareTo(Object o) {
|
||||
FullNode node = (FullNode) o;
|
||||
return (int) Math.ceil(mLatency.getAverage() - node.getLatencyValue());
|
||||
double doubleResult = getLatencyValue() - node.getLatencyValue();
|
||||
if(doubleResult > 0)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
else if(doubleResult < 0)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
else
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ public class LatencyNodeProvider implements NodeProvider {
|
|||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public boolean updateNode(FullNode fullNode) {
|
||||
mFullNodeHeap.remove(fullNode);
|
||||
boolean removed = mFullNodeHeap.remove(fullNode);
|
||||
System.out.println("Removed: "+removed);
|
||||
return mFullNodeHeap.offer(fullNode);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -21,8 +21,7 @@ public class FullNodeTest {
|
|||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFullNodeAverageLatency(){
|
||||
FullNode fullNode = new FullNode("wss://dummy");
|
||||
fullNode.getLatencyAverage().setAlpha(0.5);
|
||||
FullNode fullNode = new FullNode("wss://dummy", 0.5);
|
||||
fullNode.addLatencyValue(100);
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals(100.0, fullNode.getLatencyValue());
|
||||
fullNode.addLatencyValue(50);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -91,4 +91,89 @@ public class LatencyNodeProviderTest {
|
|||
FullNode best = latencyNodeProvider.getBestNode();
|
||||
Assert.assertSame(nodeC, best);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void realisticSituationTest(){
|
||||
FullNode node1 = new FullNode("wss://fi.bts.dcn.cx/ws");
|
||||
FullNode node2 = new FullNode("wss://mx.palmpay.io/ws");
|
||||
FullNode node3 = new FullNode("wss://miami.bitshares.apasia.tech/ws");
|
||||
FullNode node4 = new FullNode("wss://valley.bitshares.apasia.tech/ws");
|
||||
FullNode node5 = new FullNode("wss://atlanta.bitshares.apasia.tech/ws");
|
||||
FullNode node6 = new FullNode("wss://dallas.bitshares.apasia.tech/ws");
|
||||
FullNode node7 = new FullNode("wss://eu-west-2.bts.crypto-bridge.org");
|
||||
FullNode node8 = new FullNode("wss://england.bitshares.apasia.tech/ws");
|
||||
FullNode node9 = new FullNode("wss://eu-west-1.bts.crypto-bridge.org");
|
||||
FullNode node11 = new FullNode("wss://netherlands.bitshares.apasia.tech/ws");
|
||||
FullNode node12 = new FullNode("wss://api.bts.blckchnd.com");
|
||||
FullNode node13 = new FullNode("wss://bitshares.nu/ws");
|
||||
FullNode node14 = new FullNode("wss://bitshares.openledger.info/ws");
|
||||
FullNode node15 = new FullNode("wss://citadel.li/node");
|
||||
FullNode node16 = new FullNode("wss://api-ru.bts.blckchnd.com");
|
||||
FullNode node17 = new FullNode("wss://dex.rnglab.org");
|
||||
FullNode node18 = new FullNode("wss://nl.palmpay.io/ws");
|
||||
FullNode node19 = new FullNode("wss://bitshares.crypto.fans/ws");
|
||||
FullNode node20 = new FullNode("wss://bit.btsabc.org/ws");
|
||||
|
||||
LatencyNodeProvider provider = new LatencyNodeProvider();
|
||||
provider.addNode(node1);
|
||||
provider.addNode(node2);
|
||||
provider.addNode(node3);
|
||||
provider.addNode(node4);
|
||||
provider.addNode(node5);
|
||||
provider.addNode(node6);
|
||||
provider.addNode(node7);
|
||||
provider.addNode(node8);
|
||||
provider.addNode(node9);
|
||||
provider.addNode(node11);
|
||||
provider.addNode(node12);
|
||||
provider.addNode(node13);
|
||||
provider.addNode(node14);
|
||||
provider.addNode(node15);
|
||||
provider.addNode(node16);
|
||||
provider.addNode(node17);
|
||||
provider.addNode(node18);
|
||||
provider.addNode(node19);
|
||||
provider.addNode(node20);
|
||||
|
||||
node3.addLatencyValue(458.41);
|
||||
node4.addLatencyValue(458.40);
|
||||
node5.addLatencyValue(620.12);
|
||||
node6.addLatencyValue(682.64);
|
||||
node7.addLatencyValue(842.88);
|
||||
node8.addLatencyValue(842.05);
|
||||
node9.addLatencyValue(911.38);
|
||||
node11.addLatencyValue(930.58);
|
||||
node12.addLatencyValue(1002.27);
|
||||
node13.addLatencyValue(1069.96);
|
||||
node14.addLatencyValue(1060.20);
|
||||
node15.addLatencyValue(1025.14);
|
||||
node16.addLatencyValue(1060.55);
|
||||
node17.addLatencyValue(1001.44);
|
||||
node18.addLatencyValue(1036.69);
|
||||
node19.addLatencyValue(1047.19);
|
||||
node20.addLatencyValue(1286.89);
|
||||
|
||||
provider.updateNode(node1);
|
||||
provider.updateNode(node2);
|
||||
provider.updateNode(node3);
|
||||
provider.updateNode(node4);
|
||||
provider.updateNode(node5);
|
||||
provider.updateNode(node6);
|
||||
provider.updateNode(node7);
|
||||
provider.updateNode(node8);
|
||||
provider.updateNode(node9);
|
||||
provider.updateNode(node11);
|
||||
provider.updateNode(node12);
|
||||
provider.updateNode(node13);
|
||||
provider.updateNode(node14);
|
||||
provider.updateNode(node15);
|
||||
provider.updateNode(node16);
|
||||
provider.updateNode(node17);
|
||||
provider.updateNode(node18);
|
||||
provider.updateNode(node19);
|
||||
provider.updateNode(node20);
|
||||
|
||||
FullNode best = provider.getBestNode();
|
||||
Assert.assertSame("Expects node4 to be the best", node4, best);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue