BSIP-0005
This commit is contained in:
parent
ecd4672364
commit
d33362e306
1 changed files with 40 additions and 0 deletions
40
bsip-0005.md
Normal file
40
bsip-0005.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
|
|||
BSIP: 0005
|
||||
Title: Expiring Votes for Witnesses
|
||||
Authors: Daniel Larmier <Dan@cryptonomex.com>
|
||||
Fabian Schuh <Fabian@BitShares.org>
|
||||
Status: Draft
|
||||
Type: Protocol
|
||||
Created: 2015-12-16
|
||||
Discussion: <https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/265>
|
||||
<https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,18109.0.html>
|
||||
Worker: tbd
|
||||
|
||||
# Abstract
|
||||
|
||||
Votes for witnesses are a measure of reputation in that they cast a persistent
|
||||
opinion - so not like votes in the traditional sense of the word. The
|
||||
witness voting system is currently designed to ensure stability by directing
|
||||
the apathetic to vote for incumbents. Whilst this may have advantages, it
|
||||
seems to present the danger that incumbents are likely to attain a
|
||||
near-unassailable position (excepting of course those who exhibit negligent/bad
|
||||
behaviour).
|
||||
|
||||
# Motivation
|
||||
|
||||
If the aim is the create an autocracy - albeit seeded by the active witnesses
|
||||
or so original gainers of significant 'reputation' - then this is fine. However,
|
||||
it would seem to discourage serious efforts to try and break into the active
|
||||
circle by newcomers with much to contribute. At the end of the BitShares 1
|
||||
network, circa. 220M votes were required and a quick browse of the delegates
|
||||
showed that with a few notable exceptions, the majority have been in place since
|
||||
a 4 or 5 digit block number - have all been of these current, active contributors?
|
||||
|
||||
# Specifications
|
||||
|
||||
A blockchain parameter can be added that enforces a minimal freshness to votes
|
||||
that are counted and handle cases of lost keys or apathetic votes hanging
|
||||
around.
|
||||
|
||||
# Copyright
|
||||
|
||||
This document is placed in the public domain.
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue