From d33362e306ecea28186dbd6405cebe2e5dcda6b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fabian Schuh Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:00:54 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] BSIP-0005 --- bsip-0005.md | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+) create mode 100644 bsip-0005.md diff --git a/bsip-0005.md b/bsip-0005.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..663013f --- /dev/null +++ b/bsip-0005.md @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ + BSIP: 0005 + Title: Expiring Votes for Witnesses + Authors: Daniel Larmier + Fabian Schuh + Status: Draft + Type: Protocol + Created: 2015-12-16 + Discussion: + + Worker: tbd + +# Abstract + +Votes for witnesses are a measure of reputation in that they cast a persistent +opinion - so not like votes in the traditional sense of the word. The +witness voting system is currently designed to ensure stability by directing +the apathetic to vote for incumbents. Whilst this may have advantages, it +seems to present the danger that incumbents are likely to attain a +near-unassailable position (excepting of course those who exhibit negligent/bad +behaviour). + +# Motivation + +If the aim is the create an autocracy - albeit seeded by the active witnesses +or so original gainers of significant 'reputation' - then this is fine. However, +it would seem to discourage serious efforts to try and break into the active +circle by newcomers with much to contribute. At the end of the BitShares 1 +network, circa. 220M votes were required and a quick browse of the delegates +showed that with a few notable exceptions, the majority have been in place since +a 4 or 5 digit block number - have all been of these current, active contributors? + +# Specifications + +A blockchain parameter can be added that enforces a minimal freshness to votes +that are counted and handle cases of lost keys or apathetic votes hanging +around. + +# Copyright + +This document is placed in the public domain.