Update bsip-0040.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
523ed86eab
commit
07b6fa080d
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -182,8 +182,8 @@ Notes: The implementation must not differentiate on which operation the custom a
|
||||||
# Milestones
|
# Milestones
|
||||||
We propose do split the implmentation into two milestones:
|
We propose do split the implmentation into two milestones:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. Implementation of basic functionaliy to allow custom active permissions and authorities, including `any`, `none` and `lt, le, gt, ge` `asserts`. If deemed necessary by developpers, reduce to only allow one key or one account for every `custom active authority`
|
1. Implementation of basic functionaliy to allow custom active permissions and authorities, including `any`, `none` and `lt, le, gt, ge` and `attribute_assert` `asserts`. If deemed necessary by developpers, reduce to only allow one key or one account for every `custom active authority`
|
||||||
2. Evaluation of stateful asserts `limit`, `limit_monthly` and more sophisticated assert `contains_only` in terms of performance. If positively evaluated, implement
|
2. Evaluation of stateful asserts `limit` and `limit_monthly` in terms of performance. If positively evaluated, implement
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This approach allows as well to add other asserts at a later stage (with a new BSIP).
|
This approach allows as well to add other asserts at a later stage (with a new BSIP).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue