From 07b6fa080d951076c3771b8a6b8a4a52e74ae2a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Stefan=20Schie=C3=9Fl?= Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 08:07:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update bsip-0040.md --- bsip-0040.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/bsip-0040.md b/bsip-0040.md index 9948025..fc4cc38 100644 --- a/bsip-0040.md +++ b/bsip-0040.md @@ -182,8 +182,8 @@ Notes: The implementation must not differentiate on which operation the custom a # Milestones We propose do split the implmentation into two milestones: -1. Implementation of basic functionaliy to allow custom active permissions and authorities, including `any`, `none` and `lt, le, gt, ge` `asserts`. If deemed necessary by developpers, reduce to only allow one key or one account for every `custom active authority` -2. Evaluation of stateful asserts `limit`, `limit_monthly` and more sophisticated assert `contains_only` in terms of performance. If positively evaluated, implement +1. Implementation of basic functionaliy to allow custom active permissions and authorities, including `any`, `none` and `lt, le, gt, ge` and `attribute_assert` `asserts`. If deemed necessary by developpers, reduce to only allow one key or one account for every `custom active authority` +2. Evaluation of stateful asserts `limit` and `limit_monthly` in terms of performance. If positively evaluated, implement This approach allows as well to add other asserts at a later stage (with a new BSIP).