more docs on swarm connections

swarm/HowConnectionsWork.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+This document is related to "SwamConnectionFlow.txt", but should probably be read first. This is not a discussion of how other ipfs implementations
+work, but rather how the c-ipfs implementation works now. Over time, implementation details may change. But the following will (should?) make
+other implementations happy to have c-ipfs join the swarm.
+
+To make this document a little less confusing, let me define some terms:
+
+connection - a network connection. It could be a pipe, a tcp connection, or anything else. For now, we're only handling TCP
+
+connection message - a simple struct to store the bytes, the size of the bytes, and any error conditions
+
+connection handler - an instance of a connection handler handles the traffic across 1 connection 
+
+stream handler - a routine that processes a byte array (coming from / going to) a (stream handler / connection), and can return with a byte array that 
+may (probably will) be sent back to the same (stream handler / connection ).
+
+Stream handlers are chained together. They pass a connection message, and expect a connection message in return. Let's work with an example. 
+
+A possible (and normal) setup is that incoming data is received by the connection,
+passed to a multistream stream handler, which unwraps it and passes it to a secio stream handler, which unwraps it and passes it to a multistream
+stream handler, which unwraps it, and passes it to a yamux stream handler, which unwraps it and determines that it is a kademlia message. It looks up its
+kademlia stream handler, which unwraps it, processes it, and returns a response (Note: NULL is a valid response, meaning don't bother sending anything
+back). Then the chain is traversed in the opposite direction.
+
+connection handler
+	- Multistream
+		-- Secio
+			--- Multistream
+				---- Yamux
+					----- Kademlia
+				---- Yamux
+			--- Multistream
+		-- Secio
+	- Multistream
+connection handler
+
+Now lets work with another example.
+
+A client wants to send a kademlia message to another peer. It asks the peer for its kademlia stream handler (which will create one if necessary), and 
+passes the handler its message. The kademlia handler passes that data to yamux, which passes it to multistream, which passes it to secio, which
+passes it to multistream, which passes it to the connection handler, which actually sends the message across the wire. Any results are returned in 
+a connection message.
+
+User has a Kademlia message to send
+	- Kademlia handler
+		-- yamux handler
+			--- Multistream handler
+				---- Secio handler
+					----- Multistream handler
+						------ connection handler
+					----- Multistream handler
+				---- Secio handler
+			--- Multistream handler
+		-- yamux handler
+	- Kademlia handler
+User processes the response
+
+Why so much complexity? Because servers can choose to communicate in a variety of ways. It is up to you and the server to decide if you want to 
+talk to each other. You can choose to not use secio, or replace yamux with another stream muxer, etc. You can choose to have multiple connections
+to one server, or use a stream muxer.
+
+Now, after all of the discussion above, read the document "SwarmConnectionFlow.txt" to see the typical way swarm peers are connected.

swarm/SwarmConnectionFlow.txt

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ They will send one back
 Send multistream protocol id (18 bytes) plus \n (1 byte)
 Send id protocol (?? bytes) plus \n (1 byte)
 Receive ID protocol back (16 bytes)
-Receive 2 bytes (167, 4) (not sure why just yet)
+Receive yamux header with 2 bytes (167, 4) (not sure why just yet, but it looks like the id protocol sends the size, then the bytes, and yamux wraps them both)
 Receive 551 bytes (with yamux header) must be the id protocol blob
 Receive window update