agorise/bsips
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

[bsip13] initial

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Fabian Schuh 2016-03-09 14:23:07 +01:00
parent 8c37c07174
commit c493fe68ef
2 changed files with 34 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

1
README.md
View file

@ -24,3 +24,4 @@ Number | Title | Owner | Type
[10](bsip-0010.md) | Percentage-based transfer fee solution based on CER | Jakub Zarembinski | Protocol | Draft [10](bsip-0010.md) | Percentage-based transfer fee solution based on CER | Jakub Zarembinski | Protocol | Draft
11 | On Demand Voting | Daniel Larmier | Protocol | Draft 11 | On Demand Voting | Daniel Larmier | Protocol | Draft
12 | Hardfork Precdure Proposal | Fabian Schuh | Informational | Draft 12 | Hardfork Precdure Proposal | Fabian Schuh | Informational | Draft
[13](bsip-0013.md) | Disable negative voting on workers | Daniel Larimer | Protocol | Draft

32
bsip-0013.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
BSIP: 13
Title: Disable negative voting on workers
Authors: Daniel Larimer <dan@cryptonomex.com>
Status: Draft
Type: Protocol
Created: 2015-03-09
Discussion: https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/607
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/565
# Abstract
This proposal fixes a potential attack vector that might be exploited by rich shareholders that hold more collective voting power than the last approved worker (usually a refund/burn worker).
# Motivation
A whale of a group of whales can take funds from the reserve pool by creating a worker and instantly approve it with his stake. Shareholders and proxies can disapprove the new worker but only have a small time-window before the attacker makes a profit.
# Rational
Pro-active downvoting is a losing proposition. An attacker can create 1000 workers and the network will not allow you to down-vote so many workers. The only real solution is to *upvote* refund workers or removing DOWNVOTING is the actual solution to this attack.
Since upvoting of refund workers results in a higher barrier of entry for new legit workers, the solution proposed here is to remove down voting entirely.
Furthermore, a negative vote is equivalent with upvoting all alternatives and results in slightly narrower gaps between votes. It compares pretty will with comparing -1 with +1 (currently) and 0 with +1 as in this proposal.
# Specifications
This proposal could be implemented by removing the ability to cast negative votes or by not taking negative votes into consideration during vote counting in the maintenance interval.
# Copyright
This document is placed in the public domain.