agorise/bsips
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #39 from wmbutler/master

Browse source 
BSIP 0028: Worker Proposal Improvements
This commit is contained in:
Abit 2017-11-11 21:06:30 +01:00 committed by GitHub
commit 7ec8445d76
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
2 changed files with 47 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

1
README.md
View file

@ -35,3 +35,4 @@ Number | Title |
[25](bsip-0025.md) | Transaction Flat-Rates with Weighted Rate-Limitation | Fabian Schuh | Protocol | Draft [25](bsip-0025.md) | Transaction Flat-Rates with Weighted Rate-Limitation | Fabian Schuh | Protocol | Draft
[26](bsip-0026.md) | Refund Order Creation Fee in Originally Paid Asset on Cancel | Abit More | Protocol | Draft [26](bsip-0026.md) | Refund Order Creation Fee in Originally Paid Asset on Cancel | Abit More | Protocol | Draft
[27](bsip-0027.md) | Asset Issuer Reclaim Fee Pool Funds | Abit More | Protocol | Draft [27](bsip-0027.md) | Asset Issuer Reclaim Fee Pool Funds | Abit More | Protocol | Draft
[28](bsip-0028.md) | Worker Proposal Improvements | Bill Butler | Protocol | Draft

46
bsip-0028.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
BSIP: 0028
Title: Worker Proposal Improvements
Authors: Bill Butler <https://github.com/wmbutler>
Status: Draft
Type: Protocol
Created: 2017-11-11
Discussion: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/473
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/451
Worker: TBD
# Abstract
Worker Proposals can be posted without a reference to a description of the proposal. It should be possible to update the reference regardless of the state of the worker proposal. There are also cases where proposed workers that fail to get voted in or get superceded by another worker continue to be visible. This isn't a huge problem at the moment, but it is an important housekeeping operation as we move forward.
# Motivation
Having clearly defined eligible proposed and active WP's is critical to proper governance.
# Rational
Either Committee or WP Issuer should have the abiity to retire a WP. I could make the argument that the WP Issuer should be able to retire their WP at any time whether it's active or not.
# Specifications
## Current Design and Implementation
Worker Proposals cannot be updated at all
## Proposed Changes
* Allow description of the WP to updated.
* Allow WP Issuer ability to retire WP
* Possibly allow Committee to retire inactive WP
# Discussion
```
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/473
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/451
```
# Summary for Shareholders
[to be added]
# Copyright
This document is placed in the public domain.