bsip32: wording change about MSSP and 100CRP
This commit is contained in:
parent
7f291d9b06
commit
7480447b88
1 changed files with 14 additions and 13 deletions
27
bsip-0032.md
27
bsip-0032.md
|
@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ It's common sense that orders should be matched at maker price.
|
|||
|
||||
There is a parameter in price feed named MSSR, which stands for "maximum short
|
||||
squeeze ratio". Maker price of margin call orders is MSSP, which stands for
|
||||
"maximum short squeeze price", is calculated as `feed_price / ( 100% + MSSR )`.
|
||||
"maximum short squeeze price", is calculated as `feed_price / MSSR`.
|
||||
Note: `feed_price` here is in terms of debt/collateral, aka "how much debt per
|
||||
collateral".
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -53,24 +53,25 @@ is always used. It need to be changed to use MSSP when the call order is maker.
|
|||
|
||||
Currently a black swan event will occur when the call order with least
|
||||
collateral ratio is going to be matched below 100% collateral ratio price
|
||||
(name it CRP). Because the call order will be matched with incoming limit order
|
||||
at limit order's price (taker price),
|
||||
which can be higher or lower than CRP, so even if MSSP is
|
||||
below CRP, an incoming taker limit order may or may not trigger a black swan.
|
||||
(name it `100CRP`). Because the call order will be matched with incoming limit
|
||||
order at limit order's price (taker price),
|
||||
which can be higher or lower than 100CRP, so even if MSSP is below 100CRP,
|
||||
an incoming taker limit order may or may not trigger a black swan.
|
||||
So it makes sense to check if a black swan event will occur every time when a
|
||||
limit order is created.
|
||||
|
||||
After the behavior changed to always match at maker price, when MSSP is below
|
||||
CRP, an incoming taker limit order will always trigger a black swan event.
|
||||
So it makes sense to trigger the black swan event when MSSP is below CRP rather
|
||||
than waiting for an incoming limit order. That means it's no longer needed to
|
||||
check for black swan event when a limit order is created. Since checking for
|
||||
black swan event is somehow expensive, we'll gain a side benefit on performance
|
||||
with the change.
|
||||
100CRP, an incoming taker limit order will always trigger a black swan event.
|
||||
So it makes sense to trigger the black swan event when MSSP is below 100CRP
|
||||
rather than waiting for an incoming limit order. That means it's no longer
|
||||
needed to check for black swan event when a limit order is created.
|
||||
Since checking for black swan event is somehow expensive, we'll gain a side
|
||||
benefit on performance with the change.
|
||||
|
||||
When triggering a black swan event when MSSP is below CRP, sometimes the short
|
||||
When triggering a black swan event when MSSP is below 100CRP,
|
||||
sometimes the short
|
||||
position with least collateral ratio may still have more than 100% collateral
|
||||
ratio. In this case, the global settlement price is CRP but not the actual
|
||||
ratio. In this case, the global settlement price is 100CRP but not the actual
|
||||
collateral ratio of the short position with least collateral ratio.
|
||||
This is current behavior, it's fair, no need to change.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue