Merge pull request #58 from bitshares/bsip34
Add BSIP 34: Always Trigger Margin Call When Call Price Above Or At Price Feed
This commit is contained in:
commit
2f45346aac
1 changed files with 104 additions and 0 deletions
104
bsip-0034.md
Normal file
104
bsip-0034.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
|
|||
BSIP: 0034
|
||||
Title: Always Trigger Margin Call When Call Price Above Or At Price Feed
|
||||
Author: Abit More <https://github.com/abitmore>
|
||||
Status: Draft
|
||||
Type: Protocol
|
||||
Created: 2018-02-18
|
||||
Discussion: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/606
|
||||
Replaces: -
|
||||
Worker: To be done
|
||||
|
||||
# Abstract
|
||||
|
||||
Currently, in BitShares, a short position may be margin called only when both
|
||||
two requirements are met:
|
||||
* call price is above or equal to median price feed
|
||||
* no limit order on the book is buying collateral with price higher than the
|
||||
short position's call price
|
||||
|
||||
This behavior has led to certain confusion and anger among market participants.
|
||||
|
||||
This BSIP proposes a new behavior to improve the situation: drop the second
|
||||
requirement, trigger margin call when the first requirement is met.
|
||||
|
||||
# Motivation
|
||||
|
||||
To avoid ambiguity, in this article, all prices are in terms of
|
||||
`debt asset / collateral asset`, aka how much debt asset per collateral
|
||||
asset. A bid is an order to buy collateral asset with debt asset.
|
||||
|
||||
Generally, a short position may be margin called when its collateral ratio is
|
||||
below or equal to maintenance collateral ratio (MCR).
|
||||
|
||||
However, to calculate collateral ratio, a fair collateral price is needed.
|
||||
|
||||
In BitShares, there are two data sources can be used to decide the fair
|
||||
collateral price:
|
||||
* the internal market
|
||||
* the price feeds
|
||||
|
||||
Currently, both data sources are used. Specifically, collateral price is decided
|
||||
as the higher one between the highest bid price on the internal market and the
|
||||
median price feed. That said, when a short position's collateral ratio has
|
||||
fallen to below or equal to MCR according to median price feed (in this case,
|
||||
call price of the short position is above or equal to median price feed), if
|
||||
there is a bid on the market with high price, the short position won't be margin
|
||||
called.
|
||||
|
||||
This mechanism has led to certain confusion and anger among market participants.
|
||||
* there are often orders with overlapping price on the book but didn't fill
|
||||
* there are often short positions selling collaterals with low prices, but
|
||||
traders are unable to buy at those prices
|
||||
* it often causes borrowers to sell collaterals at a low price when have chances
|
||||
to sell at higher price
|
||||
* market manipulators / arbitrage traders have more chances to force borrowers
|
||||
to sell collaterals at lower price
|
||||
|
||||
This BSIP effectively proposes a new behavior: derive the fair collateral price
|
||||
only from price feeds.
|
||||
|
||||
# Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Since price feeds are provided by a set of chosen producers, the median price
|
||||
feed is usually considered trustworthy. On the other hand, instant market
|
||||
price is not as reliable, especially for the markets with poor depth, so it's
|
||||
a rather limited supplement for calculating collateral price.
|
||||
|
||||
At this moment, changing the rule to only use median price feed will clear away
|
||||
the confusion the end users may have, while still keeping the derived collateral
|
||||
price fair to an extent.
|
||||
|
||||
After this change is done, placing a new limit order will no longer trigger a
|
||||
margin call, cancelling a limit order or expiring a limit order will no longer
|
||||
trigger a margin call as well, that means we don't need to check for new margin
|
||||
calls nor black swan events in those scenarios, so we'll gain a side benefit on
|
||||
performance.
|
||||
|
||||
# Specifications
|
||||
|
||||
In `check_call_orders(...)` function of `database` class, when matching a call
|
||||
order with a limit order, there is a check:
|
||||
`if( match_price > ~call_itr->call_price )`, when the result is `true`,
|
||||
processing will be ended and `margin_called` will be returned.
|
||||
Need to skip the check and the following `return` action.
|
||||
|
||||
In `do_apply(...)` function of `limit_order_cancel_evaluator` class, and
|
||||
similar code blocks after a limit order object is removed, no longer need to
|
||||
call `check_call_orders(...)` function of `database` class.
|
||||
|
||||
# Discussion
|
||||
|
||||
[to be added if any]
|
||||
|
||||
# Summary for Shareholders
|
||||
|
||||
[to be added if any]
|
||||
|
||||
# Copyright
|
||||
|
||||
This document is placed in the public domain.
|
||||
|
||||
# See Also
|
||||
|
||||
* https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/606
|
||||
* https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=25926.0
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue