bsip#8: cli-wallet transfer fees and the fee split in discussion
This commit is contained in:
parent
e9066d0f3d
commit
00e673050c
1 changed files with 17 additions and 4 deletions
21
bsip-0008.md
21
bsip-0008.md
|
@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ at zero cost to BitShares shareholders.
|
|||
Mode feature available to users.
|
||||
7. The Initialization Package shall make provision for the creation of
|
||||
generic Fee Based Assets (FBA) and set the fee for such
|
||||
8. A GUI shall be provided in the OpenLedger and Light wallets to allow
|
||||
8. A GUI shall be provided in the Web and Light wallets to allow
|
||||
ordinary users to easily use the Privacy Mode features.
|
||||
9. Documentation of the Privacy Mode feature and Maintenance and Fee
|
||||
Accumulation account shall be provided on the appropriate reference web
|
||||
|
@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ When the project is complete, the new software will be presented to the
|
|||
witnesses as an opportunity to hard fork by switching to running the new
|
||||
package/software. At that time witnesses will face a choice:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Honor the proposal at the time the decision to spend the private investor's money was made, or
|
||||
2. Honor the proposal at the time the product is delivered (if it has changed in the mean time).
|
||||
1. Honor the proposal at the time the decision to spend the private investor's money was made, or
|
||||
2. Honor the proposal at the time the product is delivered (if it has changed in the mean time).
|
||||
|
||||
Acting against the wishes of Vote 2 could get them fired if enough people
|
||||
disagree with them keeping the implied commitment of Vote 1.
|
||||
|
@ -196,7 +196,20 @@ be.
|
|||
The argument was raised that the Privacy Mode as proposed here is not the
|
||||
feature most pressingly needed for BitShares right now.
|
||||
|
||||
## Worker Poll Interval too Short
|
||||
## Confidential Transfers already available in the CLI-Wallet
|
||||
|
||||
The privacy mode is already documented and available for use in the console-line
|
||||
wallet client at almost the same fee as non-private transfers (December 2015).
|
||||
However, since these transfers cannot participate in the Referral Program (see
|
||||
above), all fees are paid to the BitShares network. This proposal, shall it be
|
||||
implemented, splits the fee for private transactions 20%/80% (similar to regular
|
||||
transfers with the referral program) and hands out 20% of the fee to the
|
||||
BitShares network. The other 80% are given to the maintenance account and
|
||||
holders of the FBA. As a result, for BitShares shareholders to keep their 20%
|
||||
transaction fee, the other 80% need to be paid by the customer. However, the fee
|
||||
for this type of transaction is only increased to 3x and not the required 5x.
|
||||
The assumptions are that the increase in volume for this particular transaction
|
||||
type and the additional customers compensate for this loss.
|
||||
|
||||
# Copyright
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue